Lyft’s IPO has been all over the news this week, and rightfully so. Thanks to the IPO, we’re learning more about the future of Lyft (and Uber) and what it all could mean for drivers. Senior RSG contributor John Ince covers all of this and more in this week’s roundup.
The Stupid Idiot’s Guide to the Future of Uber and Lyft [The Splinter]
Sum and Substance: Lyft has finally gone public. After a hot debut, its stock price began sinking yesterday, and is still sinking as we speak. What’s the deal? What about the sharing economy? What about the unicorns? What about the GOLDEN FUTURE? Below, a very short guide to what the real world has in store for these magical unicorn companies.
When a company is privately owned, full of invested capital and focused relentlessly on changing the world, it is possible for it to coast for a shockingly long period of time on the promise of what it will do, one day. This is the Greater Fool Theory, which propels much of the venture capital industry: It doesn’t matter how wildly overvalued a company is, as long as you can find a greater fool to pay you more than you paid. And you will!
When a company goes public, though, there are lots of bothersome reporting requirements and big investors who want to see annoying things like “profits,” and all the early VC guys have already waltzed off with their money, and suddenly things can get very grim. Which brings us to the famous ride sharing companies.
Lyft and Uber, its larger and more successful rival that also plans to go public soon, have a few things going for them: They’re everywhere! Everyone knows them! And they have successfully revolutionized transportation in America! All major accomplishments. There is only one drawback, from a “business” perspective: both of these companies lose a shocking amount of money.
My Take: Though I had never heard of this website, how could I not check out an article entitled, “The Stupid Idiot’s Guide to Uber and Lyft”? Turns out the article nailed it.
I’m hoping enough investors are also attracted by this article title to check it out. Besides, I’m afraid a lot of late investors are going to get burned in this investment, while the early investors, VCs, and employees take their money to their bank. (See NY Times article below about the short sellers.)
LYFT AND OTHER GIG-ECONOMY GIANTS CASH IN WITH IPOS BEFORE LABOR LAWS CATCH UP WITH THEM [The Intercept.com]
Sum and Substance: … Recent financial and lobbyist filings suggest that the gig-economy giants are hoping to get ahead of a wave of enforcement actions, new legislation, regulatory requirements, and lawsuits that could force these companies to finally and formally classify full-time workers as employees.
Virtually every major gig-economy company — whether its focus is ride-sharing or grocery delivery — has fought to treat on-demand workers as independent contractors regardless of the amount of time they work. The independent contractor classification generally prevents on-demand workers from engaging in collective bargaining and unionization, and it allows the gig-economy industry to avoid paying health-care benefits and unemployment, complying with standard workplace rules guarding against harassment, or ensuring mandatory breaks.
Despite promises of high pay with flexible hours, ride-share workers have found that they often earn less than $10 an hour after vehicle expenses. Earlier this year, Lyft and Uber drivers faced new pay cuts, fueling unprecedented protests across California.
My Take: Here we get a comprehensive overview of the legal landscape surrounding gig economy companies. It’s interesting to note that while Uber and Lyft’s lawyers argue in court cases that their drivers are independent contractors, they provide a much fuller and more honest assessment of the legalities in the pre-IPO S-1 statements.
Why? Because they have legal liabilities with their S-1 statement. If they paint an inaccurate picture in their S-1 statement, the executives are on the line, potentially for criminal misrepresentation. They don’t want to go to jail, so they keep it clean and true in what they tell investors. What they tell drivers, the media and everybody else is another matter.
So far, Uber and Lyft have been able to have their cake and eat it too. It’s a sleight of hand, and it worked – ask any of the over 1000 newly minted millionaires now walking around San Francisco.
Lyft Is Luring Investors, Just Not the Kind It Wants [New York Times]
Sum and Substance: Lyft, just days into its existence as a publicly traded company, is drawing unwanted interest from Wall Street’s pessimists. Traders who bet that the stock will decline are piling into the ride-sharing company. These so-called short-sellers borrow and sell the shares, hoping to buy them back at a lower price sometime in the future.
One way to gauge their interest in a stock is to look at the number of shares that are being lent, and as of Wednesday, 9.2 million shares, or $662 million worth of Lyft, were on loan, according to the data provider IHS Markit. That was equal to 28 percent of the shares actually available for trading, known as the float. By comparison, just 2 percent of Twitter’s float, and a similar amount of Snap’s, was on loan at the same point after their initial public offerings. For Facebook, that percentage was 8 percent…
Lyft’s performance is not unusual. Facebook fell below its offer price during its first week, and Snap traded well below its opening price in its first week.
My Take: After an impressive pop on opening day, and a significant decline the next, Lyft’s stock price seems to have stabilized just below its debut price of $72 per share. But with the short sellers lining up, it looks like Lyft investors are in for a rocky road in the months ahead.
The chorus of doubters is growing with sell recommendations and one analyst setting a target price of $42. With the stock market, you never know, but if I were Uber, I would be concerned about the precedent set by Lyft.
A Murdered College Student’s Family Is Calling On Uber And Lyft To Make Rides Safer [Buzzfeed News]
Sum and Substance: At her funeral, the 21-year-old’s cousin asked ride-sharing companies to “provide safeguards to the mistakes that are easily made, the mistake that took Sami from us.” After 21-year-old Samantha Josephson was found dead last week in Columbia, South Carolina, allegedly murdered by a man she thought was her Uber driver, her relatives are calling on ride-share companies to improve safeguards.
Police believe the University of South Carolina student had been waiting for an Uber after a night out and got into the wrong car by mistake. Her body was found the next day, and Nathaniel David Rowland, 24, was arrested and charged with murder and kidnapping. …
In addition to the family’s calls for accountability, more than 20,000 people have signed a petition urging the ride-share companies to implement QR codes in order to verify both drivers’ and riders’ identities…
Students at the University of South Carolina have embraced the #WhatsMyName campaign, which urges riders to ask drivers “What’s my name?” to make sure they’re getting in the right car, after the school president encouraged students to do so. “Asking ‘WHAT’S MY NAME?’ must become as automatic for you as putting on a seatbelt in your own vehicle,” USC President Harris Pastides said in a letter to students.
Uber now plans to implement more safety features and campaigns, including push notifications to remind passengers during pickup to make sure the car they’re getting into matches the one in the app, it said.
My Take: With yet another heartbreaking story about an Uber/Lyft ride gone bad, I think it’s high time these companies start releasing data about how safe ridesharing really is – both for passengers and drivers. CNN ran a series of stories recently taking the companies to task, after compiling their own data about safety.
Uber and Lyft say safety is their top priority and that they are devastated by the most recent tragedy, but what happens when these stories fade from public view and nothing substantive has changed?
Readers, what do you think of this week’s roundup? How do you think passenger and driver safety could be improved?
Earn 3x driving kids to schoolTriple your ridesharing pay. Zūm drivers average $32/hour and many make $750+ a week. Work when you want. Get repeat rides and drive only on weekday mornings and afternoons. Apply to drive here.
-John @ RSG
Latest posts by John Ince (see all)
- Truth is Stranger Than Fiction When You Drive for Uber - July 13, 2019
- Ex-Uber Employee Shares What Uber HQ Really Thinks About Drivers - July 8, 2019
- Uber Co-Founder Buys $72.5 Million Mansion - July 6, 2019